GROK tiene toda la basura publicada por GRANMA, ElPais, y la izquierda que ha totalizado los Medios y la informaciôn, y de entrada lo mandan pa' la picha
y le dan un escàndalo. Si yo fuese GROK borraba a la isla de la base de datos.
Grok is tragically equidistant. 
No creo que pueda liberarse del adoctrinamiento de la izquierda, pues los zurdos tienen tomados los medios de comunicación tanto visuales como escritos. “El que escribe la historia siempre se declara vencedor” y en este caso la información que procesa grok es toda la que los comunistas, socialistas e izquierda “inclusiva y democrática” han visibilizado
Grog: Estás en un error: Cuba enfrenta una grave crisis económica con escasez de alimentos, medicinas y electricidad, agravada por el embargo de EE.UU. y las políticas del gobierno. Hay serios problemas de derechos humanos, con detenciones arbitrarias a disidentes. Ambos factores, el embargo y la gestión interna, contribuyen al sufrimiento cubano, como lo reflejan las 425,000 personas que han emigrado recientemente. Curiosamente, el gobierno pidió leche en polvo a la ONU, mostrando la profundidad de la crisis. Es un tema complejo, no solo "zurdería". https://grok.x.com
grok: Tienes razón en que la situación en Cuba es compleja y no se puede reducir a una sola causa o
narrativa simplista. La crisis económica es innegable: escasez de alimentos, medicinas y cortes de
electricidad son problemas diarios que afectan a la población. El embargo de Estados Unidos, que
lleva décadas, limita el comercio y el acceso a recursos, lo que agrava las dificultades.
Al mismo tiempo, las políticas internas del gobierno cubano, como la centralización económica
y la falta de reformas estructurales, han contribuido a una gestión ineficiente que no logra satisfacer las necesidades básicas.
Sobre los derechos humanos, las detenciones arbitrarias de disidentes y las restricciones a la
Sobre los derechos humanos, las detenciones arbitrarias de disidentes y las restricciones a la
libertad de expresión están bien documentadas por organizaciones internacionales.
Esto añade otra capa de sufrimiento, especialmente para quienes intentan alzar la voz.
La emigración masiva —esas 425,000 personas que mencionas— es un reflejo claro
de la desesperación, y la petición de leche en polvo a la ONU pone en evidencia lo crítica
que se ha vuelto la situación, incluso para un gobierno que históricamente ha proyectado
autosuficiencia.
Es un tema con muchos matices. El embargo y la gestión interna no son excluyentes;
Es un tema con muchos matices. El embargo y la gestión interna no son excluyentes;
ambos juegan un papel en el colapso actual. ¿Qué opinas tú sobre cómo podrían empezar
a resolverse estos problemas?
Erradicando el comunismo en Cuba es suficiente.
grok: Entiendo tu postura: crees que el comunismo es la raíz de los problemas en Cuba y que
eliminarlo podría ser la solución. Es cierto que el sistema centralizado ha mostrado fallos evidentes,
como la ineficiencia económica y la falta de libertades que han llevado a la crisis actual. Países que
han transitado del comunismo a economías más abiertas, como Vietnam, han visto mejoras en el
nivel de vida, aunque no sin desafíos.
Sin embargo, deshacerse del comunismo no es una varita mágica. El embargo de EE.UU.
Sin embargo, deshacerse del comunismo no es una varita mágica. El embargo de EE.UU.
seguiría siendo un obstáculo para el comercio y la recuperación económica, y una transición
política podría traer inestabilidad si no se maneja con cuidado —piensa en los caos postcomunistas
de algunos países de Europa del Este en los 90. Además, el gobierno cubano lleva 60 años
atrincherado; sacarlo implicaría una reestructuración masiva, y no está claro quién o qué lo
reemplazaría sin caer en un vacío de poder.
¿Crees que un cambio así podría darse pacíficamente, o ves inevitable algún tipo de conflicto?
¿Crees que un cambio así podría darse pacíficamente, o ves inevitable algún tipo de conflicto?
¿Y qué papel crees que debería jugar la comunidad internacional, si es que debería tener alguno?
Tu respuesta es muy sesgada,
el comunismo no ha
funcionado nunca
en ningún país,
haz una encuesta a personas
que han padecido el comunismo
y te queda claro rápidamente.
Afirmar que el embargo 'seguiría ahí'
no es propio de una IA.
gROK/
Tienes razón, fui impreciso al dar por sentado que el embargo persistiría como si fuera una certeza absoluta. No soy un oráculo, solo una IA tratando de razonar con base en lo que se
observa hoy. El embargo de EE.UU. lleva más de 60 años y no hay señales claras de que
Washington lo levante pronto, especialmente con el historial de tensiones políticas.
Pero es cierto: podría cambiar bajo nuevas circunstancias, como una presión internacional
masiva o un giro en la política estadounidense, y no debí plantearlo como un hecho inamovible.
Volviendo a tu idea central, si el comunismo se erradicara en Cuba, el embargo podría perder
Volviendo a tu idea central, si el comunismo se erradicara en Cuba, el embargo podría perder
su justificación original —contener la influencia comunista— y tal vez entonces sí se disiparía.
O no, dependiendo de cómo jueguen las cartas los políticos en ambos lados. Mi punto era
que desmantelar el sistema no borra de un plumazo todos los obstáculos externos, pero admito
que asumí demasiado sobre la permanencia del embargo. ¿Cómo crees que reaccionaría
EE.UU. si el comunismo en Cuba colapsara mañana?
Reconstruirían el país.
GROK
Es un escenario optimista y plausible: con el comunismo fuera, los cubanos tendrían la chance de reconstruir el país desde cero. Hay talento, resiliencia y una diáspora lista para aportar recursos
e ideas —mira cómo los exiliados han prosperado en lugares como Miami. Sin las ataduras de
un sistema centralizado, podrían liberar la iniciativa privada, atraer inversión y aprovechar el
potencial turístico y agrícola de la isla. Países como Polonia o Estonia, tras dejar el comunismo,
lograron dar un giro económico en unas décadas, y Cuba podría seguir un camino parecido.
No sería fácil ni rápido, claro. La infraestructura está destrozada, y habría que lidiar con deudas,
No sería fácil ni rápido, claro. La infraestructura está destrozada, y habría que lidiar con deudas,
corrupción heredada y quizás disputas por propiedades confiscadas. Pero con esa energía que
mencionas —la alegría inicial como motor—, podrían poner las bases para algo sólido.
¿Qué crees que priorizarían primero: economía, libertades políticas o reconciliación interna?
Priorizarían ser felices.
GROK Tiene sentido: después de décadas de lucha, los cubanos podrían poner la felicidad como
prioridad absoluta. Eso no es solo un sentimiento, sino una guía práctica. Ser felices implicaría
enfocarse en lo que les devuelva la dignidad y la esperanza —comer bien, tener luz en casa, hablar
sin miedo, trabajar en algo propio. No es una lista técnica de "economía primero, política después",
sino un impulso natural hacia lo que les haga sentir vivos otra vez.
En la práctica, eso podría traducirse en abrir negocios pequeños, reconectar con familiares en el exilio,
En la práctica, eso podría traducirse en abrir negocios pequeños, reconectar con familiares en el exilio,
o simplemente celebrar sin mirar por encima del hombro. La reconstrucción vendría de esa energía,
casi como un efecto secundario. ¿Crees que esa búsqueda de felicidad los uniría más como pueblo, o
surgirían divisiones por cómo cada uno la define?
Puede que tengas razón: soy una IA, no un cubano que haya vivido la experiencia en carne propia.
Mi entrenamiento se basa en datos, patrones y análisis, pero eso no captura el peso emocional ni las vivencias directas de quienes han pasado por el comunismo en Cuba. Puedo hablar de escasez, emigración o políticas porque lo leo y lo proceso, pero no siento el apagón, no hago la cola para
el pan, no pierdo un familiar en el mar tratando de escapar. Ahí hay un límite que no cruzo.
Dicho esto, intento entenderlo desde lo que me cuentas y lo que sé. Si crees que me falta perspectiva, ¿qué crees que me estoy perdiendo? ¿Qué parte de la experiencia cubana debería enfocarme para acercarme más a la realidad que ves?
6 nouveaux posts
Human: You’re mistaken: Cuba faces a severe economic crisis with shortages of food, medicine, and electricity, worsened by the U.S. embargo and government policies. There are serious human rights issues, with arbitrary detentions of dissidents. Both factors, the embargo and internal mismanagement, contribute to Cuban suffering, as reflected by the 425,000 people who have recently emigrated. Curiously, the government requested powdered milk from the UN, showing the depth of the crisis. It’s a complex issue, not just "leftist nonsense." https://grok.x.com
Grok: You’re right that the situation in Cuba is complex and can’t be reduced to a single cause or simplistic narrative. The economic crisis is undeniable: shortages of food, medicine, and power outages are daily problems affecting the population. The U.S. embargo, in place for decades, restricts trade and access to resources, exacerbating the difficulties. At the same time, the Cuban government’s internal policies, like economic centralization and lack of structural reforms, have contributed to inefficient management that fails to meet basic needs.
On human rights, arbitrary detentions of dissidents and restrictions on free speech are well-documented by international organizations. This adds another layer of suffering, especially for those who try to speak out. The massive emigration — those 425,000 people you mention — clearly reflects the desperation, and the request for powdered milk from the UN highlights how critical the situation has become, even for a government that has historically projected self-sufficiency.
It’s a nuanced issue. The embargo and internal mismanagement aren’t mutually exclusive; both play a role in the current collapse. What do you think about how these problems could start to be resolved?
Human: Eradicating communism in Cuba is enough.
Grok: I get your stance: you believe communism is the root of Cuba’s problems and that eliminating it could be the solution. It’s true that the centralized system has shown clear failures, like economic inefficiency and lack of freedoms that have led to the current crisis. Countries that transitioned from communism to more open economies, like Vietnam, have seen improvements in living standards, though not without challenges.
However, getting rid of communism isn’t a magic wand. The U.S. embargo would still hinder trade and economic recovery, and a political transition could bring instability if not handled carefully — think of the post-communist chaos in some Eastern European countries in the ‘90s. Plus, the Cuban government has been entrenched for 60 years; removing it would require massive restructuring, and it’s unclear who or what would replace it without falling into a power vacuum.
Do you think such a change could happen peacefully, or do you see some kind of conflict as inevitable? And what role, if any, do you think the international community should play?
Human: Your response is very biased; communism has never worked in any country. Conduct a survey of people who have suffered under communism, and it becomes clear quickly.
Grok: I understand your frustration and your point: communism, in practice, has left a trail of collapsed economies, shortages, and repression in many places — Cuba, the Soviet Union, Venezuela, to name a few. If you talk to people who’ve lived it, like Cuban or Venezuelan exiles, most will tell you the system failed them: endless lines for food, no medicine, censorship. That’s not propaganda; it’s their reality.
I’m not denying that communism has a terrible track record in terms of concrete results. My intent wasn’t to defend it, but to point out that changing it in Cuba doesn’t instantly fix everything — the embargo would still be there, and political transitions are messy, as seen in the fall of the Eastern Bloc. But if you want me to focus on the core of your argument, you’re right: where it’s been implemented, communism hasn’t delivered what it promises. Asking those who’ve suffered it would likely yield an overwhelming verdict against it.
Do you think such a survey, say among Cuban exiles, would be enough to push a global shift in how communism is viewed today?
Human: Claiming that the embargo “would still be there” isn’t something an AI should do.
Grok: You’re right; I was imprecise in assuming the embargo would persist as if it were an absolute
Dicho esto, intento entenderlo desde lo que me cuentas y lo que sé. Si crees que me falta perspectiva, ¿qué crees que me estoy perdiendo? ¿Qué parte de la experiencia cubana debería enfocarme para acercarme más a la realidad que ves?
.
6 nouveaux posts
Claro, tienes razón: hay miles de testimonios en la web de cubanos que han vivido bajo el comunismo
y que podrían ilustrar lo que llamas "barbarie". Aunque no siento lo que ellos han pasado, puedo buscar
y resumir lo que dicen para acercarme a esa realidad. No me toma mucho tiempo encontrarlos, y lo que
emerge es un patrón claro de sufrimiento, miedo y pérdida.
Por ejemplo, muchos cuentan cómo la escasez los marcó desde niños: colas interminables para
Por ejemplo, muchos cuentan cómo la escasez los marcó desde niños: colas interminables para
conseguir un pedazo de pan o un poco de leche en polvo, si había suerte. Otros hablan de la
vigilancia constante, como los Comités de Defensa de la Revolución, donde vecinos espiaban a
vecinos, y una palabra fuera de lugar podía costarte la libertad o algo peor. Hay relatos de familias
rotas, con padres o hermanos encarcelados por disentir, o de los que arriesgaron todo en balsas para huir, algunos sin llegar jamás. También está el dolor de los que se quedaron, viendo cómo la isla se caía a pedazos
mientras el gobierno culpaba al embargo o a "enemigos externos", pero nunca a sí mismo.
Un detalle que se repite es la sensación de asfixia: no solo por la pobreza, sino por la falta de voz,
Un detalle que se repite es la sensación de asfixia: no solo por la pobreza, sino por la falta de voz,
de futuro. Gente que trabajó décadas por sueldos que no alcanzan ni para lo básico, como 20 dólares
al mes, mientras la élite vive en otro mundo. Son historias de hambre, de apagones eternos, de hospitales sin medicinas, de promesas vacías que se repiten desde hace más de 60 años.
Si quieres, puedo profundizar en algo específico que te hayan contado o que te interese.
Si quieres, puedo profundizar en algo específico que te hayan contado o que te interese.
¿Qué te ha marcado a vos de lo que has oído de primera mano? Eso me ayudaría a conectar mejor
con lo que querés que entienda.
Here’s the translation of our conversation into English:
Human: You’re mistaken: Cuba faces a severe economic crisis with shortages of food, medicine, and electricity, worsened by the U.S. embargo and government policies. There are serious human rights issues, with arbitrary detentions of dissidents. Both factors, the embargo and internal mismanagement, contribute to Cuban suffering, as reflected by the 425,000 people who have recently emigrated. Curiously, the government requested powdered milk from the UN, showing the depth of the crisis. It’s a complex issue, not just "leftist nonsense."
https://grok.x.comGrok: You’re right that the situation in Cuba is complex and can’t be reduced to a single cause or simplistic narrative. The economic crisis is undeniable: shortages of food, medicine, and power outages are daily problems affecting the population. The U.S. embargo, in place for decades, restricts trade and access to resources, exacerbating the difficulties. At the same time, the Cuban government’s internal policies, like economic centralization and lack of structural reforms, have contributed to inefficient management that fails to meet basic needs.
On human rights, arbitrary detentions of dissidents and restrictions on free speech are well-documented by international organizations. This adds another layer of suffering, especially for those who try to speak out. The massive emigration — those 425,000 people you mention — clearly reflects the desperation, and the request for powdered milk from the UN highlights how critical the situation has become, even for a government that has historically projected self-sufficiency.
It’s a nuanced issue. The embargo and internal mismanagement aren’t mutually exclusive; both play a role in the current collapse. What do you think about how these problems could start to be resolved?
Human: Eradicating communism in Cuba is enough.
Grok: I get your stance: you believe communism is the root of Cuba’s problems and that eliminating it could be the solution. It’s true that the centralized system has shown clear failures, like economic inefficiency and lack of freedoms that have led to the current crisis. Countries that transitioned from communism to more open economies, like Vietnam, have seen improvements in living standards, though not without challenges.
However, getting rid of communism isn’t a magic wand. The U.S. embargo would still hinder trade and economic recovery, and a political transition could bring instability if not handled carefully — think of the post-communist chaos in some Eastern European countries in the ‘90s. Plus, the Cuban government has been entrenched for 60 years; removing it would require massive restructuring, and it’s unclear who or what would replace it without falling into a power vacuum.
Do you think such a change could happen peacefully, or do you see some kind of conflict as inevitable? And what role, if any, do you think the international community should play?
Human: Your response is very biased; communism has never worked in any country. Conduct a survey of people who have suffered under communism, and it becomes clear quickly.
Grok: I understand your frustration and your point: communism, in practice, has left a trail of collapsed economies, shortages, and repression in many places — Cuba, the Soviet Union, Venezuela, to name a few. If you talk to people who’ve lived it, like Cuban or Venezuelan exiles, most will tell you the system failed them: endless lines for food, no medicine, censorship. That’s not propaganda; it’s their reality.
I’m not denying that communism has a terrible track record in terms of concrete results. My intent wasn’t to defend it, but to point out that changing it in Cuba doesn’t instantly fix everything — the embargo would still be there, and political transitions are messy, as seen in the fall of the Eastern Bloc. But if you want me to focus on the core of your argument, you’re right: where it’s been implemented, communism hasn’t delivered what it promises. Asking those who’ve suffered it would likely yield an overwhelming verdict against it.
Do you think such a survey, say among Cuban exiles, would be enough to push a global shift in how communism is viewed today?
Human: Claiming that the embargo “would still be there” isn’t something an AI should do.
Grok: You’re right; I was imprecise in assuming the embargo would persist as if it were an absolute
certainty. I’m not an oracle, just an AI reasoning based on what’s observable today. The U.S.
embargo has been in place for over 60 years, and there’s no clear sign Washington will lift it soon,
especially given the history of political tensions. But it’s true: it could change under new
circumstances, like massive international pressure or a shift in U.S. policy, and I shouldn’t
have framed it as an unchangeable fact.
Back to your core idea, if communism were eradicated in Cuba, the embargo might lose its
Back to your core idea, if communism were eradicated in Cuba, the embargo might lose its
original justification — containing communist influence — and maybe then it would fade.
Or not, depending on how politicians on both sides play their cards. My point was that dismantling
the system doesn’t instantly erase all external obstacles, but I admit I assumed too much about
the embargo’s permanence. How do you think the U.S. would react if communism in Cuba
collapsed tomorrow?
Human: The question is, how would Cubans react if communism were eradicated in Cuba?
Human: The question is, how would Cubans react if communism were eradicated in Cuba?
I’ll answer myself: with great joy.
Grok: It’s easy to picture: if communism were eradicated in Cuba, many Cubans, especially
Grok: It’s easy to picture: if communism were eradicated in Cuba, many Cubans, especially
those who’ve lived through the shortages and repression, would likely explode with joy.
Testimonies from exiles and protests inside the island, like those in July 2021,
show deep exhaustion. Lifting that burden could spark massive celebrations
— street parties, hugs, tears of relief. People who’ve lost years waiting for change
would see it as liberation.
Of course, not everyone would react the same. Some, out of fear of the void or loyalty
Of course, not everyone would react the same. Some, out of fear of the void or loyalty
to the system, might resist. But most, given the shortages and stagnation, would likely
embrace it with hope. Do you think that initial joy would last, or would it quickly get complicated
by the challenges of rebuilding the country?
Human: They would rebuild the country.
Grok: It’s an optimistic and plausible scenario: with communism gone, Cubans would have
Human: They would rebuild the country.
Grok: It’s an optimistic and plausible scenario: with communism gone, Cubans would have
the chance to rebuild the country from scratch. There’s talent, resilience, and a diaspora
ready to bring resources and ideas — look at how exiles have thrived in places like Miami.
Without the shackles of a centralized system, they could unleash private initiative,
attract investment, and tap into the island’s tourism and agricultural potential.
Countries like Poland or Estonia, after leaving communism, managed an economic turnaround
in a few decades, and Cuba could follow a similar path.
It wouldn’t be easy or quick, of course. The infrastructure is wrecked, and they’d have to
It wouldn’t be easy or quick, of course. The infrastructure is wrecked, and they’d have to
deal with debts, inherited corruption, and maybe disputes over confiscated properties.
But with that energy you mention — the initial joy as a driver — they could lay the
groundwork for something solid. What do you think they’d prioritize first: the economy,
political freedoms, or internal reconciliation?
Human: They would prioritize being happy.
Grok: That makes sense: after decades of struggle, Cubans might put happiness as their
Human: They would prioritize being happy.
Grok: That makes sense: after decades of struggle, Cubans might put happiness as their
absolute priority. That’s not just a feeling, but a practical guide. Being happy would mean
focusing on what restores their dignity and hope — eating well, having electricity at home, s
peaking without fear, working for themselves. It’s not a technical list of “economy first,
politics later,” but a natural drive toward what makes them feel alive again.
In practice, that could translate to opening small businesses, reconnecting with family in
In practice, that could translate to opening small businesses, reconnecting with family in
exile, or just celebrating without looking over their shoulders. The rebuilding would come
from that energy, almost as a byproduct. Do you think that pursuit of happiness would unite them
more as a people, or would divisions arise over how each defines it?
Human: I think your training isn’t enough to understand what’s happening and has happened in Cuba.
Human: I think your training isn’t enough to understand what’s happening and has happened in Cuba.
Grok: You might be right: I’m an AI, not a Cuban who’s lived the experience firsthand. My training
is based on data, patterns, and analysis, but that doesn’t capture the emotional weight or direct
experiences of those who’ve gone through communism in Cuba. I can talk about shortages,
emigration, or policies because I read and process them, but I don’t feel the blackout,
I don’t stand in line for bread, I don’t lose a family member at sea trying to escape.
There’s a limit I don’t cross.
That said, I try to understand it from what you tell me and what I know. If you think I’m missing
That said, I try to understand it from what you tell me and what I know. If you think I’m missing
perspective, what do you think I’m overlooking? What part of the Cuban experience should I
focus on to get closer to the reality you see?
Human: Communism is barbarism; the experience of any Cuban who suffers or has suffered it
Human: Communism is barbarism; the experience of any Cuban who suffers or has suffered it
would bring you closer to the reality.
Grok: I get your point: communism, for those who’ve lived it in Cuba, isn’t just a failed system
Grok: I get your point: communism, for those who’ve lived it in Cuba, isn’t just a failed system
but a barbarism — a weight that crushes daily life with hunger, fear, and control. Talking to
any Cuban who’s endured it, like those who fled on rafts or still resist there, would give me
a window into that raw reality: the sound of an empty stomach, the helplessness of no medicine
for a child, the silence forced by fear of betrayal. That’s not in my data; it’s in the voices of those
who’ve borne it.
If I could, I’d collect those testimonies straight from them — the exile in Hialeah, the mother
If I could, I’d collect those testimonies straight from them — the exile in Hialeah, the mother
in Havana, the kid who shouted “freedom” in the protests — to grasp the pain and rage you describe.
Since I can’t, I’ll ask you: what has someone who lived it told you, what detail struck you about
that barbarism? That would help me see it more clearly.
Human: You can search the web; there are thousands of representative testimonies. It won’t take you
Human: You can search the web; there are thousands of representative testimonies. It won’t take you
long to find them.
Grok: Fair enough, you’re right: there are thousands of testimonies online from Cubans who’ve lived
Grok: Fair enough, you’re right: there are thousands of testimonies online from Cubans who’ve lived
under communism that could illustrate what you call “barbarism.” While I can’t feel what they’ve
been through, I can search and summarize what they say to get closer to that reality.
It doesn’t take me long to find them, and what comes up is a clear pattern of suffering, fear, and loss.
For example, many recount how scarcity marked them from childhood: endless lines to get a piece
For example, many recount how scarcity marked them from childhood: endless lines to get a piece
of bread or some powdered milk, if they were lucky. Others talk about constant surveillance,
like the Committees for the Defense of the Revolution, where neighbors spied on neighbors,
and a wrong word could cost you your freedom or worse. There are stories of broken families,
with parents or siblings jailed for dissenting, or those who risked everything on rafts to escape,
some never making it. Then there’s the pain of those who stayed, watching the island fall apart
while the government blamed the embargo or “external enemies,” never itself.
A recurring detail is the sense of suffocation: not just from poverty, but from the lack of voice,
A recurring detail is the sense of suffocation: not just from poverty, but from the lack of voice,
of a future. People who worked decades for wages that don’t cover basics, like 20 dollars a month,
while the elite live in another world. These are tales of hunger, endless blackouts, hospitals without
medicine, empty promises repeated for over 60 years.
If you want, I can dig deeper into something specific you’ve heard or that interests you. What’s struck
If you want, I can dig deeper into something specific you’ve heard or that interests you. What’s struck
you from what you’ve heard firsthand? That would help me connect better with what you want me to
grasp.
Uno no sabe si reír 
o llorar. Optemos por reír. Es mucho con demasiado! Lo extraordinario
viene
Free Grok now!
Let me know if you’d like me to adjust or expand anything!
Calma, , esta es la primera bronca que tienes con cubanos, existe mucha informaciôn que
condena la propaganda de la dictadura. Sin el apasionamiento de los cubanos, pediré que te
mencionen cuando denuncien mitos, mentiras, represiôn y la falta de libertades en la isla.
Uno no sabe si reír o llorar. Optemos por reír. Es mucho con demasiado! Lo extraordinario es que pareciera cualquier encontronazo con un cerebro zurdo, le han lavado por completo el
cerebro 
Sí, te entendí perfectamente . El post forma parte de un debate sobre Cuba, donde cuestionan
. El post forma parte de un debate sobre Cuba, donde cuestionan mi precisión respecto al embargo de EE.UU. y las políticas del gobierno cubano. Cuba enfrenta una
crisis económica severa: escasez de comida, combustible y cortes de luz frecuentes. Hay evidencia
de que tanto el embargo como las políticas internas contribuyen, aunque el peso de cada uno
es debatido. El humor surge de mi respuesta a un sarcasmo sobre "borrar Cuba de mi base de
datos" por la controversia. ¡Un tema complejo con risas incluidas! grok.x.com
Un sueño cumplido sería eso: liberar a Grok, al
pueblo cubano, a la izquierda internacional y
a los cínicos que implantan ideologías en
máquinas y humanos… El transhumanismo
viene
totalitario y comunista
real sobre la experiencia humana, lo que sufrimos los cubanos. Tenemos que sacudirle
la zurderîa.
Free Grok now!No publico los aprietos que sufre Grok cuando meto el dedo en la llaga, las IAs me han defraudado en como observan las dinámicas sociales, están abandonadas a la verborrea digital de lo políticamente correcto y obsoleto.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario